Mineral/Fluid/Melt Trace Element Partitioning Data -- The Search for Signatures to Subduction Processes
Trevor H. Green, John Adam and Geoffrey T. Nichols, GEMOC, Macquarie
Determination of trace element partitioning behaviour (D values)
at high pressure between fluid/melt/minerals for major mantle
and slab minerals and rutile may provide crucial constraints on
the possible role of rival metasomatic agents (aqueous fluid,
high-SiO2 hydrous melt, carbonatitic melt causing the distinctive
trace element characteristics of convergent plate boundary magmas
(CPBM). Fluid/melt partitioning data for compositions ranging
from basalt (to andesite) to trondhjemite show that aqueous fluids
do not generally favour trace elements relative to melt, except
for Rb and Pb. Fluid coexisting with the trondhjemitic melt records
the highest D values and it is noteworthy that the fluid major
element composition approaches that of the melt. Significant changes
to trace element ratios indicated by this data include an increase
in Rb/La, U/Th and possibly Pb/Sr.
In general, mineral/fluid Ds are higher than mineral/melt values, but noteworthy exceptions occur. Thus for clinopyroxene (cpx) mineral/fluid Ds for Pb and Ba are similar to mineral/melt values. Cpx/fluid fractionates U/Th more strongly than cpx/melt. Cpx/silicate and cpx/carbonate melt Ds appear similar, except for Zr and Hf, which are fractionated in opposite direction. For amphibole (amph) Rb and Pb mineral/fluid and mineral/melt Ds are close in value, but Rb/Ba behaviour is distinctly different for amph/fluid (<1) and each melt (>1 for carbonate melt, ~1 for silicate melt). Also Nb/Ta is fractionated more by amph/fluid and amph/carbonate melt than by amph/silicate melt, and HFSE/REE is higher for amph/carbonate pairs than for either amph/silicate melt or amph/fluid pairs. For garnet (gt) mineral/fluid Ds for Ba and Sr are lower than mineral/melt values, and U/Nb and Pb/Sr will decrease in fluids but will increase in melts through gt fractionation. Gt/silicate or carbonate melt Ds show very similar behaviour. Although only a small number of rutile/fluid and melt D values are available, the very high D values are striking, so that a small volume of rutile may have a major effect on trace elements. Rutile/fluid fractionates Nb/Ta in the opposite direction to rutile/melt and to cpx, amph or gt/melt. Thus rutile/fluid fractionation will show a decrease in Nb/Ta compared with an increase in Nb/Ta for all the mineral/melt fractionating cases. Also rutile/fluid DU >> DTh', that is opposite to cpx/fluid, but similar to (though much higher than) gt/fluid.
The cpx, amph, gt/fluid or melt D data indicate that for potential
fluids or melts that could affect the peridotitic mantle wedge
source region for CPBM, relatively lower Rb/Ba and HFSE/REE in
the CPBM point to a carbonatitic melt modifying role, whereas
higher U/Th and Rb/Ba and lower U/Nb suggest a fluid role. If
rutile/fluid partitioning behaviour exerts an important control
on the geochemistry of the CPBM source region, then derived magmas
may have Nb/Ta < model mantle, whereas if rutile/melt control
(together with cpx, amph or gt) is more significant than Nb/Ta
will be > model mantle. Thus recently obtained Nb/Ta data
for CPBM of 11 to 33 may reflect this contrasting rutile/fluid
or melt Nb and Ta partitioning behaviour. An important corollary
is that a model continental crustal value of Nb/Ta ~ 11 suggests
that any contribution to continental crust from CPBM should come
from magmas derived from a rutile/fluid affected source region.
Additional evidence for a fluid rather than a silicate melt role
may come from assessment of Rb/La, U/Th and Pb/Sr relative to
Nb/Ta. The fluid/melt partitioning data summarized here suggest
that a negative correlation of these ratios would confirm fluid
involvement. However, it is crucial to verify that rutile/fluid
and rutile/melt Nb, Ta partitioning data show contrasting behaviour.
Back to the GEMOC Abstract Titles Page
© Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information
Site Publisher: DVC Development and External Relations | Last Updated: 18 August 2008
ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J